Superleague

The “here and there” Gacinovic is waiting for his correct assessment

Published

on

Mijat Gacinovic is a multi-talented player but that doesn’t always bode well for a footballer looking for a permanent role like the Serbian midfielder at AEK.

The ever-philanthropic all-rounder Ivan Jovanovic publicly acknowledged the magnitude of his usefulness and influence at the end of last season. Mijat Gacinovic so that Panathinaikos can be led to a very strong finish in the championship and win the cup together. He praised the Serbian midfielder’s work and was keen for him to stay even when he didn’t.

The player was made by AEK, o Matthew Almeida he supported this step from the beginning and found essential elements that he would like to implement: speed, intensity, directness in passing, quick decisions, avoiding hasty actions, but also shows how important it is to him, when he is available, he has permanence in the starting XI, but what role suits him best and why does the manager treat him, at least to this day, as “passepartout?”.

Gacinovic is consumed in extreme roles

As a center midfielder for Panathinaikos rather than a winger, he played some excellent games last year and improved the quality of the trifoil midfield, as admitted by Jovanovic. At AEK, Gacinovic is wasted in winger roles, taking sides and not being deployed where it suits and suits him best, which is in the axis. It’s certainly an advantage that he can adapt to different roles, but that shouldn’t be the norm when needed or with a very specific tactical requirement.

Yes, Gatsinowicz is a polytheist, but he is treated as a “hermit”. He has a specific role to play and to this day we see him on the right and left, although the team has solutions for the ends of the attack. For example, if the manager wants to keep Levi Garcia – and rightly so from what we’ve seen on the boulevard – off the wings and permanently cement him in a forward role, then there’s Amrabat and Eliasson. Of course, Zuber has just returned. So why should the team be denied a player from their axis when there are more normal solutions to their goals?

The Jonsson-Symanski duo in front of the stoppers does not justify Almeida to this day. We’ve never seen them both play well in the same game until now. Instead, we watched both fall behind against PAO, regardless of the fact that Jonsson (especially) needed to stay in the game to level the axis and avoid the rodeo we saw in the second half. Gacinovic wants and deserves a role he can play better, Almeida knows. When we see him play there is another story…

Source: sport 24

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending

Exit mobile version