paradox of history

In 1998, Joan Laportathen public relations officer blue elephantA motion for censure was filed and lost. Josep Luis Nuñez, criticized it as a “presidential administration in which business owners have no role.” Sound familiar?he also said Nuñez “He is leading Barça into a public company.” Paradoxically, it is Laportista who is now selling the advantages of being an SA, taking ownership from its partners and selling it to third parties. It’s the environment. It is paradoxical to say that, Laporta Provided information to the Spanish CNI and cooperated in “operations against Catalonia”. Xavier Martorellaccording to VillarejoIn order to unjustly prosecute the club president at the time. Sandro Rosellmakes it unstable. balsa.For destabilizing operations, in the case of neymar‘.Someday it will be revealed who was behind the Oresa pharmacist’s baseless accusations. low cell and Bartomeu Committed a crime when signing. lastly, Laporta He came forward as a private whistleblower. There is also a paradox regarding Espai Barça. Laporta criticized the remodeling of the Camp Nou Bartomeu, it cost 800 million “because we were not in a favorable financial situation” when the club’s debt was 350.And he did it for the price. 1.45 billion, when the club’s debt soared to 1,150. But the most unrealistic paradox is that of the “incident.” Negreira‘.when they charge Bartomeu, Laporta The matter was brought as a personal accusation, but in 2008 it was revealed that he also hired a vice president of arbitrators and even quadrupled his compensation. Paradoxically, in the end he went from accuser to accuser.