Motorsports
Wolff affair: Why it is the first act of a new power struggle in Formula 1
All of Mercedes’ rival Formula 1 teams have denied in identical statements that they have contacted the FIA to investigate a possible leak of confidential information from the FOM to Toto Wolff via his wife Susie Wolff. And this can be translated as the beginning of a new political “war” in sport: between the FIA and the FOM.
The case began when the possibility was published in the media, in particular in the magazine BusinessF1, that Toto Wolff, on behalf of Mercedes F1 – of which he is a director and co-owner – had received confidential information from FOM (Formula One Management), owner of the commercial F1 rights) that could give the team an advantageous position by exploiting or manipulating this information.
According to the publication, the information may have been passed on to Toto Wolff by the Austrian’s wife, Susie Wolff, as she is the managing director of the F1 Academy – the FOM institution that aims to propel young female participants into the top ranks of motorsport to transport .
The matter went beyond a mere media rumor when the FIA announced on Tuesday afternoon (May 12th), upset with the Wolffs, that the disciplinary committee had found possible unfair competition through the sharing of confidential information between a Formula 1 team boss and one unnamed The man mentioned examines the FOM member.
In short, the FIA announced that it is investigating whether Suzy Wolff passed on information about FOM’s activities that FOM did not want to reach the teams and, conversely, also information from the internal deliberations of the sport’s ten teams that FOM in particular could have found useful.
The FIA and its president Mohamed bin Sulayem said the disciplinary committee’s investigation was launched on the basis of the relevant publications, but behind the scenes, members of the association leaked information that the investigation was carried out by some of the sport’s teams This sport was requested in the investigation into unfair competition.
But all nine of the sport’s other teams quickly publicly stated that none of them had been involved in a relevant complaint to the FIA. Quite the opposite: The nine groups tried together to defend Susie Wolff, and all made an identical statement on Wednesday afternoon (June 12).
This announcement, with the necessary changes in each team’s name and other formal points, states: “We can confirm that we have not lodged a complaint with the FIA regarding the allegation about information of a confidential nature between a dManager orgroup her F1 and a FOM employee. We are happy and proud to support the F1 Academy Rector Your advisor through our commitment to sponsor a participant with our colors from next season.”
Even Red Bull director Christian Horner, who has had a heated argument with Toto Wolff for a long time, confirmed that his team had not had any complaints about the matter. Speaking to British broadcaster Sky Sports, Horner said: “Look, we have a bitter rivalry on the track, but we have not filed an official complaint against Suzy, Toto or… Mercedes at FIA.
In fact, Red Bull is the team that has been most involved in the F1 Academy since its inception, so much so that we will field three cars alongside the two Red Bull-owned teams. We work closely with Suzy, who is doing great work in the F1 Academy. So, like everyone else, we were quite surprised by last night’s announcement. But it was certainly not initiated or demanded by Red Bull.
The FIA’s concerted “emptying” of teams now puts the federation in the difficult position of having to explain what gave rise to its disciplinary committee’s investigation into the matter. However, as of Wednesday afternoon (June 12), Mercedes had not received any official information from the FIA on this topic.
Given this development, and in particular the lack of direct communication between the FIA and Mercedes (which, given the seriousness of the allegations and the sensitivity of the matter, constitutes a serious offense), questions are legitimately raised about the interpretation of this paradoxical situation that poisons the atmosphere of this microcosm.
It is noted that the important decisions of Formula 1 are taken by the F1 Committee, which consists of 30 members: the 10 teams, 10 representatives of the FIA and 10 representatives of the FOM. Leaking confidential information can promote democracy in decision-making and potentially critical decisions that have not yet been disclosed.
What if the affairs of the sprint races, the censorship of the drivers, the acceptance or non-acceptance of Andretti as the sport’s 11th team were simple disputes between Mohammed ben Sulaghem and FOM, that is, the American Liberty Media that controls FOM? A possible competition misconduct scandal could be the first act of a new political “war” in sport.
Source: sport 24
Hi, my name is Jayden James. I am a writer at Sportish, and I mostly cover sports news. I have been writing since high school and have been published in various magazines and newspapers. I also write book reviews for a website. In my free time, I enjoy playing soccer and basketball.
Motorsports
PHOTOGRAPH. Legendary F1 circuit undergoes changes ahead of start of 2026 season
Suzuka Circuit is preparing for the 2026 Japanese Grand Prix; Large-scale asphalt renewal works have started on the track before the new Formula 1 season.
The Japan circuit has been home to F1 for many years and is considered one of the most difficult and favorite tracks among drivers. High speeds, technical configuration and variable weather conditions have repeatedly made Suzuka the venue for iconic championship moments.
The 2026 stage is scheduled for March 29 and will be the third stage in the season calendar.
The western part of the track, including the iconic Spoon Corner, is now completely closed. A new layer of asphalt was laid, which should change the properties of the coating.
The new surface is expected to have a low level of grip at the beginning of the weekend, but grip will gradually increase as the rubber accumulates; this can significantly affect the cars’ settings.
本日の #西コース路面張替え工事 pic.twitter.com/AbKkyGKgq9
— 鈴鹿サーキット Suzuka Circuit (@suzuka_event) December 27, 2025
Source: Sport UA
Ruth Waterhouse is an author and sports journalist who writes for Sportish. She is known for her coverage of various sports events and her insightful analysis of sports-related news. With a passion for sports and a keen eye for detail, she has become a respected voice in the sports community.
Motorsports
Did everything change suddenly? Red Bull driver reveals details of his F1 departure
Yuki Tsunoda admitted that on the eve of Red Bull’s official decision, he heard rumors that he would retain his place in Formula 1 within the Red Bull system, but the truth turned out to be completely different.
Before the last stage of the season in Abu Dhabi, it was announced that Isak Hajar will replace the Japanese in 2026. Racing Bulls duo will be Liam Lawson and Arvid Lindblad. As a result, Tsunoda will move into the role of Red Bull’s reserve and test driver at the start of the new era.
Tsunoda was informed about the team’s 2026 plans after the Qatar Grand Prix and, according to him, was already mentally preparing for his reserve role. But shortly before the official meeting, he heard completely different information.
“I was told of the decision after the race in Qatar, but it was not taken seriously at first,” Tsunoda said.
“I was prepared for this scenario, but the news was different from what I had heard before, so it surprised me.”
The Japanese also noted that the decision could change at the last minute:
“I heard before the briefing that the whole thing could literally be replayed. There were many reasons for this, of course. But when they told me I wouldn’t have a permanent position next year it didn’t feel like the end of the world.”
“Abu Dhabi was ahead, so I immediately focused on the next race.”
Despite the disappointment of moving to the reserve driver position, the driver hinted that his role at Red Bull could be broader than the standard job of reserve driver.
“There is a possibility that my duty will not be limited to simulator and reserve pilot status,” Tsunoda said.
I’ve already heard a few possible scenarios. “I’ll rest for now and then start preparing for next season.”
Source: Sport UA
Ruth Waterhouse is an author and sports journalist who writes for Sportish. She is known for her coverage of various sports events and her insightful analysis of sports-related news. With a passion for sports and a keen eye for detail, she has become a respected voice in the sports community.
Motorsports
Mercedes explains how Hamilton’s move to Ferrari affected the team
Mercedes director of track engineering Andrew Schoulin commented on Lewis Hamilton’s impact on the car’s development a year after his departure.
Hamilton and Mercedes have formed the most successful partnership in F1 history, winning six drivers’ championships and eight constructors’ championships between 2014 and 2021.
But at the end of 2024, the Briton opted to switch to Ferrari, and in 2025 this turned out to be unsuccessful: Hamilton failed to reach the podium in a single Grand Prix.
The 40-year-old champion was replaced by Kimi Antonelli, who made significant progress alongside the experienced George Russell.
With his departure, Hamilton left the team leadership role to Russell. This allowed Antonelli to adapt to F1 without the pressure of being responsible for car feedback, although Shovlin stressed that his communication about the car was of a high standard.
“Honestly, George is fine. The important thing is that we don’t develop the car based solely on what the pilot says,” Shovlin said.
“Most of the work comes from simulations: we look for downforce, the stability of the car, we reduce aerodynamic drag and tune the suspension to ensure the car falls into the best aerodynamic window.
So most decisions are not based on the pilot saying “I need this” and we rush to find a solution. But it is very useful to have a consistent pilot like George. He knows these cars within those rules, so we didn’t have to worry about losing our mark in the development of the car.”
“Kimi also describes the behavior of the car perfectly, so there were no problems in that regard. The main thing is that we had a fantastic collaboration with Lewis and a lot of success, and then he decided to try a new challenge at Ferrari.”
“We always looked at Kimi as the future of the team and a training year was inevitable. We fully embraced that and overall I think it went well.”
Source: Sport UA
Ruth Waterhouse is an author and sports journalist who writes for Sportish. She is known for her coverage of various sports events and her insightful analysis of sports-related news. With a passion for sports and a keen eye for detail, she has become a respected voice in the sports community.
-
Ligue 13 years agoRenato Sanchez signed in Paris for five years
-
Europa League4 years agoIn transfer alert at Olympiakos for additions and concessions
-
Europa League4 years agoFenerbahce – Eintracht 1: 1: The Germans took 1st place in the Olympiacos group
-
Europa League4 years agoWithout Nainggolan and Samata, the 11th team from Antwerp
-
Europa League4 years agoEuropa League
-
Europa League4 years agoAtalanta announced the acquisition of Boga
-
Europa League4 years agoFears that Zapata will be out for 4 months
-
Premier League4 years agoExcept for the rest of January, Sean was injured
