“The hated Super League is back on the table.”

The impact of the day’s news is indisputable. The European Court of Justice ruled this Thursday in favor of Super League compared to the position of UEFA and FIFA, and the media reaction to this ruling has been huge across Europe due to its impact on the organization of football competitions. The British media in particular has been particularly critical of the impact of this judicial decision. Sun. “Super bad news”was the title on his website, but what really hurt was the subtitle: “The hated European Super League is back on the table following a court ruling that is a huge blow to UEFA and its fans. It’s here.”

The tabloid envisions a scenario in its conclusion. “Fans may have to protest again over concerns over the establishment of a European Super League” I’m worried that it will come back.

The court found that FIFA and UEFA breached competition law when they blocked the creation of a European Super League in 2021. The Sun recalled that “football fans across the country were already campaigning against Super League when it was proposed two years ago.” Two years ago, 12 of Europe’s biggest clubs proposed the creation of a European Super League. The proposal was met with significant backlash as fans across the continent protested the idea.

Premier League clubs have withdrawn one after another in response to fans’ visceral reactions, leaving fans concerned that Super League will be introduced after all. He mentioned “an anecdote”. The sentence included the words, “Rest in peace to football as we know it.”

guardian “The European Super League received a huge boost after the ruling,” he admitted. mirror called it “a major blow to UEFA and FIFA, whose attempts to prevent separatist competition are said to be illegal.”

to German, built He suspects Super League is coming. “UEFA has been defeated at the European Supreme Court. The major football associations, FIFA and UEFA, cannot condition the approval of other competitions and discourage clubs and players from taking part in such competitions. It cannot be banned, the court ruled on Thursday.”) Luxembourg”. Bild newspaper reported the DFL’s position as follows: “The Court confirmed that the criteria for recognition of other competitions outside the federation pyramid of the European sports model must be transparent, objective, non-discriminatory and proportional. This is natural and to be expected. UEFA and FIFA need to review the standards already in place, adapt them if necessary and apply them legally. He admitted that he was confused about the legal response, saying, “We will provide more details as soon as we can evaluate the full ruling.” I’m going to comment.”

In France, L’Equipe It provided a historical perspective on the Court’s decision by asking the question, “Is it equivalent to the Bosman decision?” “European justice supports Super League,” he concluded.

In Italy, La Gazzetta dello Sport He emphasized that the European Court of Justice agrees with Super League’s “abuse of superior position by UEFA and FIFA”. “Today’s statement changes everything.

“The EU court has also taken a tough stance against UEFA’s list, which may be contrary to European rules.”

In Portugal, to the ball He viewed the reaction from the local soccer community as “a blow for European and world soccer.”