The only sign that escaped the Ferrari disaster in Monaco

Ferrari needs to be analyzed, Monaco GP of Equation 1.. The Italian team started Leclerc in the first position and Carlos Sainz Secondly. And the only certainty is Maranello I didn’t do the right thing. Strategy is key in Monaco, a circuit that is almost impossible to overtake. Rain didn’t help as it gave more options for surprises. But the truth is that Ferrari lost its position in Red Bull with two drivers. Sainz finished in 2nd place, but Perez won in 4th place.And when Leclerc first came out, how his partner was Carlos And two Red bull They overtook him and finished in 4th place. For teams that want to win both titles, the results will be unacceptable in this race.

But to analyze what happened, we need to go further.Charles Leclerc has a team at the end of the race “I made too many mistakes.” And on the radio he was very angry: “No words. No words … Ai, Ai, Ai … I can’t do this. I can’t do this.”.. “Charles, let’s focus now, there are lots of races and we’ll be back together.”Binotto replied. “Yes, yes, I’m sure we’ll recover, but it hurts at home.”

Leclerc blamed the team. There is no self-criticism. It is true that the main responsibility of a team’s strategy rests on the wall. The wall has a broader general vision of everything that is happening on the truck than the pilot can know. Nevertheless, The wall also needs feedback from the pilot to confirm or exclude the strategy.

That nuance was the key. If not, check the facts. Leclerc was undoubtedly leading the race, but the course was exhausted. That’s where Red Bull chose to continue the attack, and took the risk of using a second Perez. Perez was 4th and stopped very early to place the middle on lap 16. Verstappen did it on lap 18, like Leclerc, and Sainz chose not to stop. The current classifications are as follows: Sainz led with extreme rain tires that were slower than Perez (2nd), Leclerc (3rd) and Verstappen (4th), all of which were intermediates.

what happened? Leclerc lost his position with Perez because he was a victim of the book’s undercut. The Ferrari wall took two laps to react, which was a mistake. But the biggest mistake was that neither the team nor the driver thought it was too late to stop and had to stay on the track to change to dry tires later.

Leclerc truck engineer Xavier Marcos had already missed the possibility of waiting for the truck to go directly to dry tires. When asked if he would dry the tires directly, Leclerc replied, “Yes, but it was too early now.” But then Leclerc was told on the radio that Perez had stopped taking breaks, and after the lap the rider himself sent a clear message. “If you have a break, it will certainly be much faster.” In short, he recommended changing tires for intermediate tires. And although it was too late, he lost his position with Perez.

Sainz, in the opposite case

The opposite case happened in Sainz. The Spaniards made a difference regarding Leclerc in his comments. “Box, box,” they said to Carlos and called him to take a break. “I don’t know if that’s the right decision. I’m almost ready to dry.”Carlos pointed out. And a few seconds later, Wall trusted his words and agreed to keep him outside. As a result, Carlos Sainz was placed in a hegemonic position. He owned the race. He had to use a strategy to win. The man from Madrid turned the table with intuition, a good read of the situation, and the courage to ask the wall to rethink his plans. Leclerc didn’t do that, and Carlos did. Simple.

However, after the race, Charles asserted that it was the team that had to make the decision in this situation. “Disappointment is not a word. Sometimes mistakes can occur. But today there are generally too many mistakes. Obviously, in these conditions, others are on intermediate or dry tires. I don’t know what I’m doing, so it depends a bit on what the team can see. They asked me if I wanted to go from extreme wet to slick tires, and I said, “Yes, but now No, “he said, which would be a little after the race. I don’t know what changed my mind and took a break. We undercut each other and I stopped behind Carlos. There are many mistakes and I can’t afford to do it, “Leclerc told reporters. Ferrari failed and Charles couldn’t stop the team like Carlos.

“I think the first decision was very clear and very wrong, and from that moment the confusion began,” he added.

The most impressive of all Ferrari They had already talked about the possibility of going directly to dry rubber before the race. actually, Carlos He said he “clarified it” before the test and set about the strategy.

Binotto: “That was the scenario we talked about.”

“It was a scenario we talked about before the race. I think the same thing happened in the past. Hamilton of Monaco (2016), this went from extreme to direct dry. That was what we knew and was part of the discussions we made and the decisions we would have needed during the race. ” Binotto The team clearly states that it will make decisions based on driver feedback. “In that sense, the driver wins. It’s essential because it has the feel, wetness and grip of the tires and trucks.”

Sainz led the team. Leclerc, no. Yes, Carlos knew that all his rivals had already stopped, so he did it from a simpler decision-making standpoint. But Leclerc made it a more complicated instruction.

Second mistake

Then a second error occurred Ferrari When CharlesIt was even more impressive. That was what robbed him of the final third place. Sainz stopped wearing dry tires and risked a victory over Perez, who would stop on the next lap. However, various messages were sent to Charles. First they called him to box, and when he was already in the pit lane, they told him not to. So he got hooked: “Shit, shit! Why did they do this? Said.

Later, Sainz realized he was definitely losing third place to Verstappen because he was changing tires and had to lose a few seconds. Therefore, some points that may be key to the World Cup with respect to leaders. Max stayed on the track for another lap and made a pit stop to move forward. Charles wouldn’t have lost his place with Verstappen if he had waited another lap.

“Obviously, the message I had wasn’t clear. They told me to go in, but then didn’t go out, but I was already in the pit lane, where I basically left everything on the radio and yelled because I just couldn’t be. I didn’t do anything and knew it was over. “Pointed out that Monaco is frustrating.

“I can’t afford to lose so many points. After the first few mistakes, I made another mistake, so it’s the first to the fourth, not the first to the second,” Charles said. Concluded.

Binotto expects an error

Ferrari boss Mattia Binotto, in anticipation of the mistakes made by the team, lost what looked like a clear double, leaving Monaco without a win.

“That was a shame. Finishing in 4th place means something was wrong with the decision we made, so obviously we need to review it,” the Italian said. I told Sports F1.

“I think I underestimated the pace of the break at that stage. Maybe I called Charles one lap earlier, or later, I left it in an extreme state and got it straight and dry. These are the errors that can occur. We need to understand why they happen and that’s the process we do, “added an engineer from Switzerland.