The Russian football union published the results of the meeting of the Expert-SWAM commission, which took place on August 6th.
RPL3rd Tour, “Krasnodar”-“Dynamo” (Moscow), Judge-Ivana Abbosimov
The moment handling FC “Krasnodar”
Time on the timer: 11th minute
The essence of the appeal: Check the judge’s decision does not record a violation of the rules; Checking the decision of the judge of the implementation of disciplinary sanctions for the Moscow Dinamo player Alexander Kutitsky
The Commission’s decision: The judge mistakenly did not record a violation of the rules and did not bring the yellow card to Alexander Kutitsky Dynamo for the breakdown of a promising attack.
Vote: unanimously
Motivation: Alexander Kutitsky violates the rules of the match against the striker Krasnodar John Cordoba.
This violation is not the deprivation of the opponent of a clear opportunity to score a goal, since the attacker player does not have a control of the ball, and a player from the team in charge Nicholas Marical, who can enter the martial arts for the ball with John Cordoba, is located nearby.
The judge should have been imposed a penalty in favor of Krasnodar and give a warning to the dynamo player Alexander Kutitsky for the fiction of a promising attack.
RPL3rd Tour, Baltika (Kaliningrad) -orenburg, Judge -EVGENY KUKULYAK
The moment handling FC “Orenburg”
Time on the timer: 20th minute
The essence of the appeal: Verification of the judge’s decision to appoint a new execution of the sanction against Orenburg
The Commission’s decision: The judge correctly appointed the re -execution of the penalty against the Oreenburg team
Vote: unanimously
Motivation: The Irakli Kvekwykiri ORANBURG player enters the penalty area for shock with a sign of 11 meters.
Kvekovekiri was the first to play the ball after the border from the crossbar, thus interfering in the game and influencing Maxim Petrov n. 73, which at the time of the blow was in the correct position.
These player actions are a violation of the penalty penetration procedure.
During the audit, VAR found evident tests of violation of the rules. According to the rules of the game and the VAR protocol, in a similar situation, the VAR takes the actual decision on the repeated penetration of the penalty.
